Nuclear Weapon?s Future Essay -- essays research papers fc

For almost a half a century, the United States and the U.S.S.R. fought a nuclear arms war, the iciness War. The Cold War offici aloney ended August 19, 1991, when the Soviet nub collapsed. Ironically, the war ended without a battle or a scape fired. In fact, nuclear weapons choose only been used once. In the consequence World War, the United States dropped two nuclear bombs, one on Hiroshima, the former(a) on Nagasaki. So, what is the future of the Nuclear Weapons Policy, housed in the United States? For now, the future seems to harp in reduction and deterrence.In 1991, the United States and Russia signed the startle strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I). According to the pact, the United States and Russia reduce the amount of strategic nuclear warheads deployed by the two countries from 13,000 and 11,000, respectively, to around 8,000 to each one. The Second treaty (START II), signed in 1993 and ratified in 1996 by the United States says that each nation would further condense their number of deployed warheads to between 3,000 and 4,500, which brings the total to almost 10,000 nuclear weapons for each side, by the projected 2003 date. START III, which would reduce the take aim of warheads to 2,000-2,500, cannot be discussed until START II Russia ratifies START II. In addition, nuclear exam ended for both sides and the production of weapon-grade fissile material has stopped. The nuclear treaties cast off enough nuclear capability, in both the United States and Russia, to damage an assail nation. In fact, without Russia and the United States nuclear arsenal, there are a scant(p) over a constant of gravitation weapons divided among the rest of the world, as inform by the sum total for Defense Information, as long as all the countries in the world approve Test Ban Treaty. In addition, demurrer experts believe it would require only a little over a thousand nuclear missiles to fen off an attack. Therefore, neither country inescapably to fea r that they will not have the strength to retaliate. Actually, the United States and its NATO ally retain their Cold War weapons of last resort doctrine that allows the first use of nuclear weapons if deemed necessary to cope with non-nuclear attacks, and Russia has announced that she will abdicate the USSRs no-first-use pledge for a position similar to NATOs. The US and Russia have 5,000 to 6,000 nuclear missiles ready to launch on 15 minutes notice,... ...ssile could agitate the war and maybe only a few hundred thousand will perish, instead of a million. However, the future seems to pull toward reduction and deterrence. plant CitedLandy, Jonathan S. US Downsizes its Nuclear-Weapons Ambitions (December 24, 1997). The Christian Science Monitor. 14 November 1999. .Nuclear Facts n Figures. Center for Defense Information. 14 November 1999. .Summary of the Center for the Security Policys High Level Round Table Discussion on the prospective of the U.S. Nuclear Deterrence, 15 July 199 7, the Ana Hotel, Washington D.C. The Center for Security Policy. 13 November 1999. . The succeeding(a) of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy Executive Summary. Academy of Sciences. 12 November 1999. .Newman, Richard J. A U.S. Victory, at a Cost of $5.5 Trillion The Nuclear-Arms Race Gets a Price drop behind (7/13/98). U.S. News & World Report. 1999 Nov 18. .