Natural Gas as an Alternate Energy Source for Transportation :: Alternate Energy Sources

innate Gas as an skip over Energy come for TransportationPetroleum, the oil that is refined to create throttle and diesel, and that as of right off is the main energy outset powering transportation worldwide, releases in like manner many pollutants into the communication channel and is not very far away from bonny a eat up resource. As global warming experiences a big threat, vaunt prices rise, and the line of products in cities around the world becomes increasingly polluted, it is fitting more unmistakable that an alternate, and cleaner, source of energy is needed for use in transportation. The best pick for a replacement to crude is inhering blow out, also known as methane. Today, twenty-four percentage of the total energy consumed in the unite States is instinctive blow, which means a change is already in progress (though due to a lack of technology in infixed gas recovery and stubbornness of consumers, it is happening slowly) Pros and Cons. However, th e important question is, why is infixed gas so more than better that petroleum? To begin, indwelling gas is much better for the environment than petroleum. If natural gas vehicles (NGVs) were to become the norm, light speed dioxide (CO2) emissions could be alleviated by ninety percent and hydrocarbon emissions could be reduced by eighty-five percent NaturalGas.org. This is very important, because it is the elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the melody that are responsible for the large increase in the greenhouse effect, which is thinking to be ca employ global warming. In addition, natural gas produces plainly ninety-two pounds of nitrogen oxides (NO2) and one pound of due south dioxide (SO2) per billion Btu of energy, as opposed to petroleums 448 and 1,122 pounds, respectively NaturalGas.org. The implication of these figures lies in the circumstance that it is nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxides that cause acid come down Pros and Cons. However, converting to natural gas would help more than just the environment.From an economic viewpoint, the general use of natural gas for transportation purposes as opposed to petroleum in the United States would not only relieve American credit on contrary oil, but would also help the economy. This is because eighty-seven percent of natural gas consumed in the United States is domestically produced, which means it is produced in America NGVC. Therefore, using natural gas instead of petroleum as an energy source for transportation would help the environment and the American economy.Natural Gas as an piece Energy Source for Transportation Alternate Energy SourcesNatural Gas as an Alternate Energy Source for TransportationPetroleum, the oil that is refined to create gasoline and diesel, and that as of now is the main energy source powering transportation worldwide, releases too many pollutants into the air and is not very far away from becoming a depleted resource. As global warming becomes a larger threat, ga s prices rise, and the air in cities around the world becomes increasingly polluted, it is becoming more apparent that an alternate, and cleaner, source of energy is needed for use in transportation. The best option for a replacement to petroleum is natural gas, also known as methane. Today, twenty-four percent of the total energy consumed in the United States is natural gas, which means a change is already in progress (though due to a lack of technology in natural gas recovery and stubbornness of consumers, it is happening slowly) Pros and Cons. However, the important question is, why is natural gas so much better that petroleum? To begin, natural gas is much better for the environment than petroleum. If natural gas vehicles (NGVs) were to become the norm, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions could be alleviated by ninety percent and hydrocarbon emissions could be reduced by eighty-five percent NaturalGas.org. This is very important, because it is the elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that are responsible for the large increase in the greenhouse effect, which is thought to be causing global warming. In addition, natural gas produces only ninety-two pounds of nitrogen oxides (NO2) and one pound of sulfur dioxide (SO2) per billion Btu of energy, as opposed to petroleums 448 and 1,122 pounds, respectively NaturalGas.org. The significance of these figures lies in the fact that it is nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxides that cause acid rain Pros and Cons. However, converting to natural gas would help more than just the environment.From an economic viewpoint, the widespread use of natural gas for transportation purposes as opposed to petroleum in the United States would not only relieve American reliance on foreign oil, but would also help the economy. This is because eighty-seven percent of natural gas consumed in the United States is domestically produced, which means it is produced in America NGVC. Therefore, using natural gas instead of petroleum as an energy source for transportation would help the environment and the American economy.